Lily Cheng
Active Incumbent91.6% AttendanceTERM: 2022-2026

Lily Cheng

Councillor Lily Cheng maintains a centrist political alignment, frequently voting with the majority and supporting key initiatives, including the mayor's agenda. Her record demonstrates general support for housing development and fiscal responsibility, coupled with selective opposition to progressive measures in cycling, transit, and specific tax policies, reflecting a cautious and market-oriented approach.

Attendance
91.6%
479 / 523 Sessions
Mayor Alignment
91.3%
Voting overlap
Motions Moved
14
Data processing...
Years Served
4
Since first vote
Housing Record

Generally supports broad housing supply initiatives, zoning simplifications, and development approvals, but frequently opposes specific affordable housing projects, modular housing, and density measures like multiplex expansions, indicating a cautious or market-oriented approach.

View Full Voting History
Transit Record

Demonstrates limited support for transit and cycling infrastructure, with notable dissents against transit funding measures and cycling network updates, suggesting a preference for maintaining existing traffic patterns or skepticism towards public transit investments.

View Full Voting History
Fiscal Record

Aligns with major budget packages and tax implementations, but consistently opposes specific tax measures such as the Vacant Home Tax and Education Property Tax Levy, reflecting a fiscally conservative stance focused on minimizing tax burdens.

View Full Voting History

Notable Votes & Deviations

Implementation of Bill 109 (More Homes for Everyone Act)

Dissent on provincial housing legislation implementation, indicating potential disagreements with specific government interventions in housing.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 14-12

Modular Housing at 175 Cummer Avenue

Opposition to a specific affordable housing project, highlighting selective stance on government-led housing solutions.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 17-3

Money-Back Guarantee Transit Motion

Dissent on a transit funding measure, reflecting limited support for public transit initiatives.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 17-6

Vacant Home Tax Update Provision

Opposition to a tax measure aimed at addressing housing vacancies, consistent with fiscal conservatism.

Voted: NoResult: Carried

Cycling Network Plan Update

Dissent on cycling infrastructure, indicating lower priority for active transportation.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-2

Community Within Reach: Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) Neighbourhood Retail and Services Study - Phase Three Final Report

Support for a housing policy study that was defeated, indicating disagreements on specific density or retail approaches.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 9-17

Towards Implementing a Maximum Indoor Temperature Requirement for Rental Units and Cooling Rooms

Backing of a tenant protection measure that failed, reflecting a pro-tenant stance that contrasts with some progressive losses.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 4-20

Making life more affordable for families by asking luxury-home buyers to chip in more

Opposition to a luxury property tax that passed, reinforcing fiscal conservatism on specific tax increases.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 17-7

Call to Order

Dissent on a procedural motion, indicating occasional opposition to meeting management procedures.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 15-7

Protecting Playgrounds and Parks: Ensuring Safety for Children and Families

Support for a parks and playgrounds safety initiative that was defeated.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 6-14

Protecting Playgrounds and Parks: Ensuring Safety for Children and Families

Support for a similar safety measure that narrowly failed in a close vote.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 9-10

Protecting Playgrounds and Parks: Ensuring Safety for Children and Families

Opposition to a component of the parks safety package that passed.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 14-5

Making life more affordable for families by asking luxury-home buyers to chip in more

Support for an increase in luxury property tax that was defeated, showing mixed stance on tax policies.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 6-18