Stephen Holyday
Active Incumbent@stephenholydayTERM: 2022-2026

Stephen Holyday

Councillor Stephen Holyday maintains a steadfast fiscally conservative and policy-cautious stance, frequently serving as the sole or primary dissenter against council majorities on progressive housing, transit, social welfare, and labor initiatives. His voting record aligns with procedural matters, law-and-order policies, traditional infrastructure upkeep, and specific development approvals, emphasizing limited government spending, low taxation, and cautious governance. Rare exceptions, such as supporting a tax on luxury-home buyers, highlight occasional breaks from his typical pattern but reinforce his overall consistent approach.

Mayor Alignment
43%
Historical voting overlap
Closest Ally
Gary Crawford
64% Agreement
Recorded Votes
Live
TMMIS integration active
Lobbying Tracking
Active
Registry monitoring on

Track Stephen Holyday

Receive an email update when they cast key votes or make public statements regarding Housing, Transit, or the City Budget.

Housing Record
46%Support Rate
Based on 242 recorded votes

The politician consistently opposes systemic reforms to increase housing density, such as missing middle housing, apartment infills, and streamlined development processes. Conversely, they tend to support site-specific zoning amendments and the development of homelessness infrastructure.

Transit Record
58%Support Rate
Based on 43 recorded votes

The politician generally supports initiatives to improve transit efficiency and expand crisis response services within the transit system. While they have opposed some specific speed-up measures, their overall record indicates a priority on enhancing the reliability and speed of public transportation.

Fiscal Record
54%Support Rate
Based on 212 recorded votes

The politician prioritizes economic stability and administrative accountability, as evidenced by their support for the Mayor's Economic Action Plan and transparency measures in the Mayor's Office. Conversely, they tend to oppose specific city service reforms and social infrastructure expansions, such as heat relief strategies and service delivery standards.

The Alignment Matrix

A real-time, side-by-side comparison of what this politician says publicly, who meets with them privately, and how they actually vote when the money is on the line. Categorized by AI for perfect apples-to-apples accountability.

💬 Public Rhetoric

Community Parks And Rec

"I support the reopening of golf courses & tennis courts when safe to do so. Outdoor activities are healthy, & are lower risk for the spread of COVID19. I have requested that @fordnation review the closure order. Please see my letter to the Premier."

🚪 Closed Doors

Mustapha Khamissa

By-law / Regulation;Procurement;Transportation: Assisting WSP to meet with and discuss matters related to GG20.12 with City of Toronto public office holders.

Erica Wallis

Economic Development;Garbage / Recycling;Real Estate / Property (City-owned): Oneida wishes to engage the City of Toronto on future decision-making regarding the Green Lane Landfill.

Housing Density

Stephanie Kwast

Planning and Development Application;Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance application.

Housing Density

Hailey McWilliam

Planning and Development Application;Minor Variance: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance Application

Steve Ostrowski

Transit / TTC: MTS plans to promote low cost fast construction value engineered LRT systems for public transit projects.

🏛️ Actual Votes

Public Transit

Expanding Toronto Community Crisis Response to the Toronto Transit Commission

Voted: Yes(2025.CC33.1)
Roads And Traffic

Toronto Parking Authority 2024 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report

Voted: Yes(2025.EX26.12)
Social Affordable Housing

Introducing Colour-Coded Signage for RentSafeTO

Voted: No(2025.CC33.25)
Social Welfare And Employment

Promoting and Delivering School Based Vision Testing in Selected Toronto High Needs Schools - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng

Voted: No(2025.MM33.22)

Notable Votes & Deviations

Generational Transformation of Toronto's Housing System

Highlighted his solitary opposition to a comprehensive housing policy overhaul, underscoring his consistent dissent on progressive housing strategies.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 19-1

Modular Housing Initiative Phase 2

Demonstrated his isolated stance against an affordable housing solution, even when the motion failed, emphasizing his resistance to social housing expansions.

Voted: NoResult: Lost 18-1

Representation at Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 228 Guildwood Parkway

Showed his independent, dissenting position on a local planning matter, contrasting with near-unanimous council support.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 23-1

Air Conditioner Pilot Program for seniors

Illustrated his opposition to social welfare programs aimed at vulnerable populations, despite broad council approval.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 21-1

Indigenous women's shelter motion

Reflected his dissent on a socially progressive initiative, highlighting a pattern of voting against measures supporting marginalized communities.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 21-1

Housing Action Plan: Avenues Policy Review Phase Two: Initial Study of Wards 9 and 11

Demonstrates his consistent dissent on progressive housing policy expansions, even in targeted studies.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 22-1

Speeding Up Light Rail Transit and Streetcars

Highlights his opposition to transit efficiency measures, aligning with his cautious approach to infrastructure changes and expansions.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 22-1

Towards Implementing a Maximum Indoor Temperature Requirement for Rental Units and Cooling Rooms

Shows his resistance to tenant protections and social welfare initiatives, even when widely supported by council.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 24-1

Bill 60, Fighting Delays, Building Faster Act, 2025, and Renter Protections - Legal Advice

Reflects his dissent on provincial legislation impacts and renter protections, consistent with his policy-cautious stance on legal and housing matters.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-1

Results of Collective Bargaining Negotiations between the City of Toronto and Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 2998

Underscores his fiscally conservative stance by opposing labor agreements that could increase city expenditures.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 21-1

Impacts of Provincial Legislation that Weakens Rental Protections

Consistent with his pattern of dissenting on measures aimed at protecting tenants and addressing housing issues.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 22-1

1138 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval

Demonstrates his opposition to individual housing development approvals, reinforcing his cautious approach to urban growth.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-1

Community Within Reach: Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) Neighbourhood Retail and Services Study - Phase Three Final Report

An instance where he supported a housing initiative, but was in the minority as the motion failed, highlighting the council's division on housing policies.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 9-17

Making life more affordable for families by asking luxury-home buyers to chip in more

A rare deviation from his typical fiscal conservatism, voting for a tax increase on luxury homes, though the motion did not pass.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 6-18

Respecting Local Authority Over Road Design - by Councillor Alejandra Bravo, seconded by Dianne Saxe

Continued his pattern of dissenting on road design and transit-related policies that could prioritize alternative transportation over existing infrastructure.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 19-1

Reimagining Weston Lions Arena through a Nominal Lease with MLSE LaunchPad

Demonstrated his opposition to a community recreation partnership, consistent with a cautious approach to new agreements and potential city liabilities.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 19-6

712 Eglinton Avenue East - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body

Shows his solitary dissent on a local planning appeal matter, highlighting his independent stance on development oversight.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 25-1

3418 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 0 Skeens Lane - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval

Another instance of opposing a specific housing development approval, reinforcing his consistent skepticism toward zoning changes.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-1

5280 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval

Maintained his pattern of dissenting on individual development projects, even when they have broad council support.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-1

199 College Street Community Benefits Charge, College Streetscape

A notable deviation where he was the sole vote against a community benefits charge, emphasizing his rigid stance against new charges or fees.

Voted: NoResult: Lost 1-22

Moving Forward with Transform Yonge: Visionary Public Realm and Cycling Gains, Without Losing a Lane

Reflects his opposition to road reconfigurations that prioritize cycling and public realm over vehicle lanes, aligning with his transit and infrastructure views.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-3

Safety on all City Sidewalks; E-bikes Enforcement

Demonstrated dissent on a law-and-order motion related to sidewalk safety, an area where he typically aligns, making this a subtle deviation.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 21-2

Understanding the Impacts of Bill 60 on Health and Well-Being in Toronto

Demonstrates his dissent on assessing the health impacts of provincial legislation, consistent with his cautious approach to legal and policy matters.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 23-1

Understanding the Impacts of Bill 60 on Homelessness in Toronto

Highlights his opposition to measures evaluating homelessness impacts of legislation, aligning with his resistance to progressive social welfare initiatives.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 23-1

2024-2025 Annual Progress Report - HousingTO 2020-2030 Action Plan and Housing Action Plan (2022-2026)

Shows his consistent dissent on housing progress reports and plans, reinforcing his resistance to broad housing strategies.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 18-1

Application for Approval to Expropriate a Portion of 20 Humberview Crescent and 50 St. Phillips Road - Stage 1

A rare instance where he supported an expropriation motion, but it failed, indicating an occasional break from his typical opposition to city acquisitions.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 5-20

Driving Efficiencies at Toronto Parking Authority to Reduce 2026 Budget Pressures

He supported a motion to drive efficiencies, but it failed, showing his alignment with fiscal conservatism even when in the minority.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 5-14

Towards Implementing a Maximum Indoor Temperature Requirement for Rental Units and Cooling Rooms

A deviation where he supported a tenant protection measure, but the motion failed, contrasting with his usual opposition to such initiatives.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 4-20

Making life more affordable for families by asking luxury-home buyers to chip in more

Another instance of his rare support for a tax increase on luxury homes, though the motion did not pass, reinforcing it as an exception to his fiscal conservatism.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 4-19