Ausma Malik
Active Incumbent@ausmamalikTERM: 2022-2026

Ausma Malik

Councillor Ausma Malik is a progressive councillor who generally aligns with the mayor and council majority on social initiatives, particularly in housing affordability and community services. She demonstrates independent judgment through frequent dissents on fiscal policies, specific transit measures, and housing deregulation, reflecting a commitment to equity, regulated housing markets, and cautious spending.

Mayor Alignment
95%
Historical voting overlap
Closest Ally
Alejandra Bravo
96% Agreement
Recorded Votes
Live
TMMIS integration active
Lobbying Tracking
Active
Registry monitoring on

Track Ausma Malik

Receive an email update when they cast key votes or make public statements regarding Housing, Transit, or the City Budget.

Housing Record
83%Support Rate
Based on 247 recorded votes

The politician consistently supports initiatives to increase housing density, streamline development processes, and enhance tenant protections. However, they exhibit selective opposition to specific shelter locations and certain land tribunal requests, indicating a balance between broad urban growth and localized concerns.

Transit Record
85%Support Rate
Based on 53 recorded votes

The politician prioritizes enhancing transit speed and operational efficiency through infrastructure studies and traffic management amendments. Conversely, they oppose the integration of social services into transit systems and the implementation of specific localized transit priority projects.

Fiscal Record
80%Support Rate
Based on 208 recorded votes

The politician demonstrates a commitment to improving city service delivery, accountability, and environmental sustainability through support for heat relief and atmospheric funds. However, the limited number of substantive fiscal policy votes makes it difficult to establish a broad ideological trend regarding overall budgetary priorities.

The Alignment Matrix

A real-time, side-by-side comparison of what this politician says publicly, who meets with them privately, and how they actually vote when the money is on the line. Categorized by AI for perfect apples-to-apples accountability.

💬 Public Rhetoric

No recent policy statements scraped from social feeds.

🚪 Closed Doors

Dillon Waldron

Procurement: Discussions regarding vendor status and procurement-related considerations

Andrew Steele

Attractions / Tourism;Economic Development: Discussing opportunities to maximize the long-term ability of the Metro Toronto Convention Centre’s ability to attract convention business and provide economic benefits to the city, region and country.

Alex Glista

Attractions / Tourism;Economic Development: Discussing opportunities to maximize the long-term ability of the Metro Toronto Convention Centre’s ability to attract convention business and provide economic benefits to the city, region and country.

Alex Glista

Attractions / Tourism;Economic Development: Discussing opportunities to maximize the long-term ability of the Metro Toronto Convention Centre’s ability to attract convention business and provide economic benefits to the city, region and country.

Erica Wallis

Economic Development;Garbage / Recycling;Real Estate / Property (City-owned): Oneida wishes to engage the City of Toronto on future decision-making regarding the Green Lane Landfill.

🏛️ Actual Votes

Public Transit

Expanding Toronto Community Crisis Response to the Toronto Transit Commission

Voted: No(2025.CC33.1)
Roads And Traffic

Toronto Parking Authority 2024 Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report

Voted: Yes(2025.EX26.12)
Social Affordable Housing

Introducing Colour-Coded Signage for RentSafeTO

Voted: Yes(2025.CC33.25)
Social Welfare And Employment

Promoting and Delivering School Based Vision Testing in Selected Toronto High Needs Schools - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Lily Cheng

Voted: Yes(2025.MM33.22)

Notable Votes & Deviations

2025 Operating and Capital Budget

Major dissent on the annual budget, opposing spending allocations or fiscal priorities, highlighting a break from the majority on core fiscal policy.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 23-1

RapidTO: Transit Priority on Dufferin and Bathurst

Dissent on a key transit initiative that passed with wide support, indicating specific concerns with this plan's implementation or impact.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-3

Review of Councillor Remuneration

Voted against a measure to review councillor pay, placing her in the minority on an ethical or procedural issue, possibly reflecting principles on public accountability.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 15-7

Reimagining Weston Lions Arena through a Nominal Lease with MLSE LaunchPad

Opposed a community facility agreement, possibly due to terms or priorities, despite majority support.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 19-6

St. Clair-Old Weston Station and 2025 GO Expansion Program Updates

Dissent on transit infrastructure updates, suggesting specific concerns with the plan or its details.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 21-1

St. Clair-Old Weston Station and 2025 GO Expansion Program Updates

Another dissent on the same transit project, indicating consistent opposition to certain aspects of the updates.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 20-2

FIFA Traffic Management

Voted against traffic management for FIFA events, reflecting concerns with disruptions, costs, or city priorities.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 13-10

Seeking Clarity on the City of Toronto's Application to the Community Sport and Recreation Infrastructure Fund

Opposed seeking clarity on funding applications, possibly due to fiscal caution, procedural issues, or equity considerations.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 18-5

Securing More Good Jobs in Toronto: Support for Hosting the Defence, Security and Resilience Bank Headquarters

Dissent on supporting a defense-related bank headquarters, indicating concerns with the initiative's focus, economic implications, or alignment with progressive values.

Voted: NoResult: Carried 19-4

Call to Order

Voted in favor of calling the meeting to order, but the motion failed, indicating procedural disputes or lack of consensus on meeting management.

Voted: YesResult: Lost 10-10